About

Editorial & authorship policy

This page explains how content on the Scraphex blog is written, reviewed, and maintained. Our goal is to be transparent about authorship, sourcing and corrections so readers — and search engines — can judge the trustworthiness of what we publish.

Who writes the blog

Posts are published under the editorial byline Teseo Calvente, Head of Growth Research at Scraphex. “Teseo Calvente” is the shared byline used by the Scraphex research team for long-form writing on Instagram prospecting, cold-email deliverability and the legal edges of B2B lead generation. Drafting, editing and fact-checking is the collective responsibility of operators inside Scraphex who run these systems every day — the byline exists to give that body of work a single voice, not to claim a single individual contributor.

How posts are produced

  1. Topic selection. We prioritise topics that (a) map to questions prospects ask us directly in demos, sales calls and cold outreach replies, and (b) have measurable search demand.
  2. Primary sourcing. Whenever we make a quantitative or operational claim — deliverability, response rates, legal thresholds — we prefer primary sources: regulator publications (AEPD, CNIL, ICO, FTC), original platform documentation, and direct measurements from systems we operate.
  3. Review. Each post is reviewed by at least one operator who did not draft it, with a separate pass for legal accuracy on topics that touch GDPR, CAN-SPAM, PECR or CASL.
  4. Publication. Posts ship with publish and last-updated dates. Where a claim depends on a law or platform behaviour that changes over time, we aim to revisit the post within 12 months.

Corrections

If you spot a factual mistake, please email [email protected]. We correct factual errors as quickly as we can verify them and update the post’s dateModified timestamp so the change is visible both to readers and to search crawlers.

What this blog is not

This blog is not legal advice. Posts that discuss GDPR, CAN-SPAM or local anti-spam laws are intended as operator-friendly explanations of how these rules tend to apply in practice — not as a substitute for counsel familiar with your specific business, jurisdiction and data sources. If you need a binding opinion, talk to a lawyer.

Affiliate links and sponsorship

We do not accept sponsored posts and the blog currently contains no affiliate links. If that ever changes, the policy will be disclosed prominently on the post itself and updated here.

Contact

Editorial queries and corrections: [email protected].